United States v. Darby Lumber Co.

United States v. Darby Lumber Co.
This case is about the Commerce Clause. For the 1931 case about taxation of reduction of debt, see United States v. Kirby Lumber Co.
United States v. Darby Lumber Co.
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 19–20, 1940
Decided February 3, 1941
Full case name United States v. Darby Lumber Company
Citations 312 U.S. 100 (more)
61 S. Ct. 451; 85 L. Ed. 609; 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1222; 3 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P51,108; 132 A.L.R. 1430
Prior history Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Appeal, under the Criminal Appeals Act, from a judgment quashing an indictment
Holding
The Fair Labor Standards Act was a constitutional exercise of Congressional power under the Commerce Clause.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Stone, joined by all
Laws applied
U.S. Const., art. I, sec. 8; Fair Labor Standards Act

United States v. Darby Lumber Co., 312 U.S. 100 (1941)[1], was a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, holding that the U.S. Congress had the power under the Commerce Clause to regulate employment conditions. The unanimous decision of the Court in this case overturned Hammer v. Dagenhart 247 U.S. 251 (1918) and limited the application of Carter v. Carter Coal Company, 298 U.S. 238 (1936).

Contents

The issue

The issue was whether Congress had overstepped its constitutional authority in creating the Fair Labor Standards Act. An American lumber company in Georgia that did not meet these standards was charged with violating the law, but had won an appeal, where the appellate judge found that the federal government is barred by the 10th Amendment from interfering in matters that are strictly local, that is, within intrastate boundaries. The Act also required the keeping of records to verify compliance; the appellee argued that this violated his 5th Amendment right protecting him from self-incrimination.

The decision

The Court reversed the appellate court decision. It affirmed the constitutional power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce, which power "can neither be enlarged nor diminished by the exercise or non-exercise of state power." FindLaw. The Court held that the purpose of the Act was to prevent states from using substandard labor practices to their own economic advantage through interstate commerce. In the Dagenhart case, the Court had made the distinction between manufacturing and interstate commerce, so that a business could argue it was engaging in the former, but had not intended the latter. Twenty-two years later, the Court found that earlier argument facile, explaining that Congress was well aware that businesses produce their goods without thought to where it will go; product is pulled and shipped to meet the orders of the day. The Court also found that the requirement of record keeping was entirely appropriate as a matter of enforcing the Act.

There were no dissenting opinions in this case.

Further reading

External links

Works related to United States v. Darby at Wikisource

  • ^ Text of United States v. Darby Lumber Co., 312 U.S. 100 (1941) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • United States v. Darby Lumber Co. — (312 U.S. 100 1941)    On 3 February 1941, in United States v. Darby Lumber Co., the Supreme Court found that the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 was constitutional. In deciding the case relating to a company in Georgia, the court overturned the …   Historical Dictionary of the Roosevelt–Truman Era

  • Commerce Clause — United States of America This article is part of the series: United States Constitution Original text of the Constitution Preamble Articles of the Constitution I · …   Wikipedia

  • Hammer v. Dagenhart — Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 15–16, 1918 Decided June 3, 1918 …   Wikipedia

  • Harlan F. Stone — 12th Chief Justice of the United States In office July 3, 1941 – April 22, 1946 …   Wikipedia

  • Hugo Black — Infobox Judge name = Hugo Black imagesize = caption = office = Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court termstart = August 19, 1937 termend = September 18, 1971 nominator = Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointer = predecessor = Willis… …   Wikipedia

  • Obiter dictum — Un obiter dictum (au pluriel, obiter dicta, souvent appelé obiter) est une expression latine signifiant « soit dit en passant ». Il existe trois définitions à cette expression : littéralement, quelque chose dit [dictum] en passant… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Obiter dictum — (plural obiter dicta, often referred to simply as dicta or obiter) is Latin for a statement said in passing . An obiter dictum is a remark or observation made by a judge that, although included in the body of the court s opinion, does not form a… …   Wikipedia

  • Business and Industry Review — ▪ 1999 Introduction Overview        Annual Average Rates of Growth of Manufacturing Output, 1980 97, Table Pattern of Output, 1994 97, Table Index Numbers of Production, Employment, and Productivity in Manufacturing Industries, Table (For Annual… …   Universalium

  • List of Sons of Anarchy characters — This is a list of characters from Sons of Anarchy. Sons of Anarchy is a drama on the American TV network FX; it focuses on the lives of an outlaw motorcycle club in Northern California. Contents 1 Sons of Anarchy Motorcycle Club 1.1 Active SAMCRO …   Wikipedia

  • New Deal — This article is about the 1930s economic programs of the United States. For other uses, see New Deal (disambiguation). Top left: The Tennessee Valley Authority, part of the New Deal, being signed into law in 1933. Top right: Franklin Delano… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”