Luther v. Borden

Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Full case name Martin Luther v. Luther M. Borden
Citations 48 U.S. 1 (more)
48 U.S. 1, 7 Howard 1 (1849)
Holding
Whether a state government is a legitimate republican form as guaranteed by the Constitution is a political question to be resolved by the President and Congress.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Taney
Dissent Woodbury

Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849)[1], was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the political question doctrine in controversies arising under the Guarantee Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution (Art. IV, § 4).

Martin Luther was part of the Dorr Rebellion, an attempt to overthrow the charter government of Rhode Island that had stymied the efforts of those who wished to broaden the voting rights of state residents. The rebellion began as a political effort but turned violent. Martin Luther was arrested by Luther M. Borden, a state official, who searched his home and allegedly damaged his property. Luther contended that the charter government was not "republican" in nature because it restricted the electorate to only the most propertied classes; because Article Four states that "the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government," Luther argued that the Supreme Court should find that Borden acted without proper authority. In doing so, the Court would necessarily find that the "Dorrite" alternative republican government was the lawful government of Rhode Island, superseding the charter government.

The Court's Decision

The Supreme Court found that it was up to the President and Congress to enforce this clause and that, as an inherently political question, it was outside the purview of the Court.

The ruling established that the "republican form of government" clause of Article Four was non-justiciable, a ruling that still holds today. However, two decades after Luther v. Borden was decided, the Fourteenth Amendment, which included the Equal Protection Clause, was added to the Constitution. Baker v. Carr, in which the Court found that the Court could examine Tennessee's apportionment of legislative districts, was based on the Equal Protection Clause, and many subsequent cases that covered much of the same ground as Luther v. Borden followed suit.

See also

External links

  • ^ Text of Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать курсовую

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Luther v. Borden — ▪ law case       (1849), U.S. Supreme Court decision growing out of the 1842 conflict in Rhode Island called the “Dorr Rebellion.”       In the spring of 1842, Rhode Island had two governors and two legislatures. One government was committed to… …   Universalium

  • Borden Parker Bowne — Borden Parker Bowen was born on 14 January, 1847, near Leonardville, NJ, and died in Boston on 1 April, 1910. He was one of six children of upright parents raised in rural New Jersey, near what is today called Atlantic Highlands. Notably, the… …   Wikipedia

  • Lizzie Borden — For other people named Lizzie Borden, see Lizzie Borden (disambiguation). Lizzie Borden Lizzie Borden, circa 1889 Born Lizzie Andrew Borden July 19, 1860(1860 07 19) …   Wikipedia

  • Article Four of the United States Constitution — relates to the states. It provides for the responsibilities states have to each other, and the responsibilities the federal government has to the states. Furthermore, it provides for the admission of new states and the changing of state… …   Wikipedia

  • Dorr Rebellion — Thomas W. Dorr from an 1844 book s frontispiece The Dorr Rebellion (1841–1842) was a short lived armed insurrection in the U.S. state of Rhode Island led by Thomas Wilson Dorr, who was agitating for changes to the state s electoral system.… …   Wikipedia

  • constitutional law — Introduction       the body of rules, doctrines, and practices that govern the operation of political communities. In modern times the most important political community has been the state. Modern constitutional law is the offspring of… …   Universalium

  • Moyer v. Peabody — Supreme Court of the United States Argued January 5–6, 1909 Decided January 18, 1909 …   Wikipedia

  • Political question — In United States law, a ruling that a matter in controversy is a political question is a statement by a federal court declining to rule in a case because: # The U.S. Constitution has committed decision making on this subject to a coordinate… …   Wikipedia

  • Republic — For the political ideology, see Republicanism. For other uses, see Republic (disambiguation). Part of the Politics series Basic forms of government …   Wikipedia

  • Hollingsworth v. Virginia — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Hollingsworth v. Virginia ArgueDate= ArgueYear= DecideDate=February 14 DecideYear=1798 FullName=Hollingsworth, et al. v. Virginia USVol=3 USPage=378 Citation=3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 378; 1 L. Ed. 644; 1798 U.S. LEXIS 145 Prior=… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”