Foss v Harbottle

Foss v Harbottle

"Foss v Harbottle" (1843) 2 Hare 461, 67 ER 189 is a famous decision English precedent on corporate law. In any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company itself. This is known as the rule in "Foss v Harbottle".

Facts

Two minority shareholders initiated legal proceedings against, among others, the directors of the company. They claimed that the directors had missapplied the company's assets.

Judgment

The court dismissed the claim and held that when a company is wronged by its directors it is only the company that has standing to sue. In effect the court established two rules. Firstly, the "proper plaintiff rule" was said stated as follows,

Secondly, the "majority rule principle" states that if the alleged wrong can be confirmed or ratified by a simple majority of members in a general meeting, then the court will not interfere.

Developments

The rule was later extended to cover cases where what is complained of is some internalirregularity in the operation of the company. However, the internal irregularity must be capable ofbeing confirmed/sanctioned by the majority.

The rule in "Foss v Harbottle" has another important implication. A shareholder cannot generally bring a claim to recover any diminution in the value of his or her shares in circumstances where the diminution arises because the company has suffered an actionable loss. The proper course is for the company to bring the action and recoup the loss with the consequence that the value of the shares will be restored.

Because "Foss v Harbottle" leaves the minority in an unprotected position, exceptions have arisen and statutory provisions have come into being which provide some protection for the minority. By far and away the most important protection is the unfair prejudice action in ss. 994-6 of the Companies Act 2006. Also, there is a new statutory derivate action available under ss. 260-269 of the 2006 Act.

Exceptions to the rule

There are certain exceptions to the rule in "Foss v. Harbottle", where litigation will be allowed. The following exceptions protect basic minority rights, which are necessary to protect regardless of the majority's vote.

;1. "Ultra vires" and illegalityThe directors of a company, or a shareholding majority may not use their control of the company to paper over actions which would be "ultra vires" the company, or illegal.

*s.39 Companies Act 2006 for the rules on corporate capacity
*"Smith v. Croft (No2)" for the illegality point

;2. Actions requiring a special majorityIf some special voting procedure would be necessary under the company's constitution or under the Companies Act, it would defeat both if that could be sidestepped by ordinary resolutions of a simple majority, and no redress for aggrieved minorities to be allowed.

*"Edwards v. Halliwell" [1950] 2 All ER 1064

;3. Invasion of individual rights
*"Pender v. Lushington" (1877) 6 Ch D 70, per Jessel MR

...and see again, "Edwards v. Halliwell" [1950] 2 All ER 1064

;4. "Frauds on the minority"
*"Atwool v. Merryweather" (1867) LR 5 EQ 464n, per Page Wood VC

...and see "Greenhalgh v. Arderne Cinemas Ltd" for an example of what was "not" a fraud on the minority

ee also

*UK company law

Notes


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Foss v. Harbottle, rule in — the rule of law that the proper plaintiff in an action in respect of a wrong done to a company is the company itself rather than individual shareholders; as such, no individual can bring an action where the alleged wrong is a transaction that may …   Law dictionary

  • Corporate litigation in the United Kingdom — is that part of UK company law which gives investors the right to sue the directors of a company, or vindicate another wrong to the company, particularly where the board of directors does not wish to act itself. Contents 1 History 1.1 The rule in …   Wikipedia

  • United Kingdom company law — Beside the River Thames, the City of London is a global financial centre. Within the Square Mile, the London Stock Exchange lies at the heart of the United Kingdom s corporations. United Kingdom company law is the body of rules that concern… …   Wikipedia

  • Unfair prejudice in United Kingdom company law — is a statutory form of action that may be brought by aggrieved shareholders against their company. Under the Companies Act 2006 the relevant provision is s.994, the identical successor to s.459 Companies Act 1985. Unfair prejudice actions have… …   Wikipedia

  • Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc — [1995] 1 BCLC 14, [1994] BCC 475, is a UK company law case on an action for unfair prejudice under s.459 Companies Act 1985 (now s.994 Companies Act 2006). It was decided in the Court of Appeal and deals with the concept of members of a business… …   Wikipedia

  • Thomas Hare — (born in England, 28 March 1806; died 6 May 1891) was a British proponent of electoral reform. He studied law, and was admitted to the Bar in November 1833 and published several works on judges decisions. In 1853 he became Inspector of Charities… …   Wikipedia

  • Derivative suit — A shareholder derivative suit is a lawsuit brought by a shareholder on behalf of a corporation against a third party. Often, the third party is an insider of the corporation, such as an executive officer or director. Shareholder derivative suits… …   Wikipedia

  • Corporate law — (also company or corporations law) is the study of how shareholders, directors, employees, creditors, and other stakeholders such as consumers, the community and the environment interact with one another under the internal rules of the firm.… …   Wikipedia

  • List of Supreme Court of Judicature cases — This is a chronological list of notable cases decided by the Supreme Court England and Wales. That is, cases from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Court of Appeal of England and Wales, and Crown Court. pre 1800 * Haxey s case… …   Wikipedia

  • Shareholders' agreement — A shareholders agreement (sometimes referred to in the U.S. as a stockholders agreement) is an agreement between the shareholders of a company.In strict legal theory, the relationships between the shareholders (as between themselves) and between… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”