Gas in Mesopotamia

Gas in Mesopotamia

It is suspected by some that the British might have used toxic gas against the Kurds in Mesopotamia, during the "Ath Thawra al Iraqiyya al Kubra" or Iraqi revolt against the British in 1920, in the period of the British Mandate of Mesopotamia.

Henry B. Gonzalez, speaking in the United States House of Representatives on March 24, 1992 said that Britain used gas against the Kurds,Fact|date=August 2008 and has often been quoted sinceFact|date=August 2008; however, a question remains over how well informed Mr Gonzalez was.

Work of recent historians

The main source usually quoted in support of the idea that Britain used poison gas in Mesopotamia is Geoff Simons, "Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam." [Geoff Simons, "Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam" (London: St. Martins Press, 1994), pp. 179-181] However, all that Simons actually says is that(a) the use of poison gas was considered and (b) aircraft were used,leading to the view that Simons may have been misread by those wishing to further this theory.

Another historian, Lawrence James, says "By September the local commander, General Sir Aylmer Haldane, was beginning to get the upper hand, although he was still desperate enough to clamour for large supplies of poison gas. It was not needed, for air power had given his forces the edge whenever the going got tough." [Lawrence James, "The Rise and Fall of the British Empire", p. 400] . On whether gas was used he writes that: "RAF Officers asked Churchill... for use of poison gas. He agreed but it was not used" [ Lawrence James, "The Rise and Fall of the British Empire", p. 398]

Niall Ferguson, in his recent book, "The War of the World" writes: "To end the Iraqi Insurgency of 1920…the British relied on a combination of aerial bombardment and punitive village burning expeditions. Indeed, they even contemplated using mustard gas too, though supplies proved unavailable”. [Niall Ferguson, "The War of the World", (Allen Lane: 2006) p.412]

Anthony Clayton, writing in the "Oxford History of the British Empire: vol. four: The Twentieth Century" that " [T] he use of poisonous gas was never sanctioned" [ Anthony Clayton, "'Deceptive Might': Imperial Defence and Security, 1900-1968" in Judith M. Brown & Wm. Roger Louis (eds.), "The Oxford History of the British Empire: vol. four: The Twentieth Century", pp. 280-306]

British policy

Britain certainly "considered" the use of poison gas in situations such as that in Mesopotamia.

In the 1920s there was a general idea, which Britain shared, that the rules of war applied to only conflict "between civilized nations." It had earlier been stated clearly that "they do not apply in wars with uncivilized States and tribes" in the "Manual of Military Law" of 1914. [HMSO, 1914, p. 235]

In a War Office minute of 12 May 1919, Winston Churchill argued for the use of tear gas: "I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. We have definitely adopted the position at the Peace Conference of arguing in favour of the retention of gas as a permanent method of warfare. It is sheer affectation to lacerate a man with the poisonous fragment of a bursting shell and to boggle at making his eyes water by means of lachrymatory gas.I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes. The moral effect should be so good that the loss of life should be reduced to a minimum. It is not necessary to use only the most deadly gasses: gasses can be used which cause great inconvenience and would spread a lively terror and yet would leave no serious permanent effects on most of those affected." [Martin Gilbert, "Winston S. Churchill", (London: Heinemann, 1976), companion volume 4, part 1]

It should be noted that Churchill refers to tear gas as poisonous;Fact|date=August 2008 in the vocabulary of the time, "poison gas" may not have referred to lethal agents, as it does today.

British actions

It is known that in 1919, gas stocks were sent out from the UK to the N. W. Frontier Province; however, it is not at all clear that they were ever actually used. [Robert Harris and Jeremy Paxman, "A Higher Form of Killing" (New York: Hill and Wang, 1982), p. 44. It seems that Harris and Paxman do not mention Iraq.]

The argument against the view that the British used gas

The following general argument suggests that Britain did not actually use gas:
* It is generally agreed that the Italians used gas in Abyssinia in 1935-36 and seems to have been the first time that gas was used from aircraft: had Britain really used gas in 1920, it would surely be equally well known and uncontested.
* If the main terror weapon used against the Kurds in 1920 was machine-guns from aircraft, it seems highly unlikely that Britain could have used gas in 1920.

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • British Mandate of Mesopotamia — الانتداب البريطاني على بلاد ما بين النهرين Mandate of the United Kingdom ← …   Wikipedia

  • Chemical warfare — For other uses, see Chemical warfare (disambiguation). This article forms part of the series Chemical agents Lethal agents Blood agents Cyanogen chloride (CK) …   Wikipedia

  • Iraqi revolt against the British — The Iraqi revolt against the British started in Baghdad in the summer of 1920 with mass demonstrations of both Sunni and Shia, including protests by embittered officers from the old Ottoman army, against the policies of Sir Arnold Wilson. The… …   Wikipedia

  • India — /in dee euh/, n. 1. Hindi, Bharat. a republic in S Asia: a union comprising 25 states and 7 union territories; formerly a British colony; gained independence Aug. 15, 1947; became a republic within the Commonwealth of Nations Jan. 26, 1950.… …   Universalium

  • Argentina — /ahr jeuhn tee neuh/; Sp. /ahrdd hen tee nah/, n. a republic in S South America. 35,797,536; 1,084,120 sq. mi. (2,807,870 sq. km). Cap.: Buenos Aires. Also called the Argentine. Official name, Argentine Republic. * * * Argentina Introduction… …   Universalium

  • Iraq — /i rak , i rahk /, n. a republic in SW Asia, N of Saudi Arabia and W of Iran, centering in the Tigris Euphrates basin of Mesopotamia. 22,219,289; 172,000 sq. mi. (445,480 sq. km). Cap.: Baghdad. Also, Irak. * * * Iraq Introduction Iraq Background …   Universalium

  • Asia — /ay zheuh, ay sheuh/, n. a continent bounded by Europe and the Arctic, Pacific, and Indian oceans. 2,896,700,000; ab. 16,000,000 sq. mi. (41,440,000 sq. km). * * * I Largest continent on Earth. It is bounded by the Arctic Ocean, the Pacific Ocean …   Universalium

  • World War I — the war fought mainly in Europe and the Middle East, between the Central Powers and the Allies, beginning on July 28, 1914, and ending on November 11, 1918, with the collapse of the Central Powers. Abbr.: WWI Also called Great War, War of the… …   Universalium

  • technology, history of — Introduction       the development over time of systematic techniques for making and doing things. The term technology, a combination of the Greek technē, “art, craft,” with logos, “word, speech,” meant in Greece a discourse on the arts, both… …   Universalium

  • Egypt — /ee jipt/, n. 1. Arab Republic of. a republic in NE Africa. 64,791,891; 386,198 sq. mi. (1,000,252 sq. km). Cap.: Cairo. Arabic, Misr. Formerly (1958 71), United Arab Republic. 2. an ancient kingdom in NE Africa: divided into the Nile Delta… …   Universalium

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”